Identifying the Constructive Components of Cooperative Learning in Islamic Studies for Lower Secondary Students in Baghdad

Authors

    Mayyadah Rokan Ahmed Al-Abbasi PhD Student, Department of Educational Management, Isfahan (Khorasgan)branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
    Abbas Khorshidi * Full Professor, Department of Educational Management, Islamshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. aba.khorshidi@iau.ac.ir
    Alaamer Abdulrahman Mahmood Al-Fadhli Full Professor, Department of Educational Management, Islamshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
    Narges Saeidian Khorasgani Associate Professor, Department of Educational Management, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Istahan, Iran.
https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.ijecs.6.3.11

Keywords:

Component, Cooperative learning, lower secondary education

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study was to identify the key components that constructively contribute to cooperative learning in Islamic Studies among lower secondary school students in Baghdad.Methods and Materials: This applied, quantitative, and cross-sectional survey study was conducted with a sample of 175 teachers (115 female and 60 male) selected from a population of 320 lower secondary school educators in Baghdad using Morgan’s sampling table. The primary instrument was a researcher-developed 54-item questionnaire, designed through expert interviews and review of global and national theories. The questionnaire utilized a 7-point Likert scale. Its reliability was confirmed through Cronbach's alpha (α = 0.986), and its validity was established through concurrent validity. Exploratory factor analysis using principal component analysis and Varimax rotation was employed to extract the underlying components of cooperative learning.Findings: Exploratory factor analysis identified 12 distinct components that construct cooperative learning in Islamic Studies, cumulatively explaining 63.189% of the total variance. These components include: curriculum design, learning strategies, cognitive skills, group and social skills, interpersonal skills, cooperative management, teacher characteristics, student characteristics, assessment and feedback, interaction and participation environment, equipment and technology, and physical learning environment. Skewness and kurtosis values indicated a normal distribution of scores. The KMO measure (0.89) and significant Bartlett's test (p < 0.001) validated the suitability of the data for factor analysis. The scree plot confirmed the retention of 12 components with eigenvalues greater than 1.Conclusion: The study highlights the multifaceted nature of effective cooperative learning and suggests its adaptation in Islamic Studies can enhance educational engagement and social development. The model is supported by both empirical data and alignment with prior research, although lack of control for teachers’ prior experience in cooperative learning may limit generalizability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abadi, F. (2024). Investigating the collaborative teaching methods of team members. Abbasi, H. R., Mahdinejad, V., & Shirazi, M. (2019). The effectiveness of the collaborative teaching-learning method (Jigsaw) on the academic performance of students in the Educational Sciences program enrolled in 2016 at Shahid Motahari Campus, University of Teacher Education, Sistan and Baluchestan Province. https://civilica.com/doc/1466861 Barkley, E. F., Major, C. H., & Cross, K. P. (2020). Collaborative learning techniques: A handbook for college faculty (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid =1351867 Gal, A. J., Translated by Fallahi, R., & Translated by Hajilo, M. (2019). Group work in school. Ruyesh Publishing, Tehran. Hill, P. R. H., Translated by Azarbaijani, M., & Translated by Mousavi Asl, S. M. (2020). Introduction to religious scales. Research Institute of Hawza and University. Jorjani, A. (2024). A systematic review of studies in the field of collaborative learning among students. Ninth International Conference on Educational Sciences, Psychology, Counseling, Teaching, and Research, Tehran. Khorshidi, A. (2022). Teaching methods and techniques. https://en.civilica.com/doc/1555440/ Kuwabara, M., Einbinder, S. D., Sun, R., & Azizi, R. (2020). Collaborative learning techniques, student learning outcomes, and equal workload within groups in different teaching modalities. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 32(2), 293-304. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1286478.pdf Mende, S., Proske, A., & Narciss, S. (2021). Individual preparation for collaborative learning: Systematic review and synthesis. Educational Psychologist, 56(1), 29-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1828086 Nasr Abadi, H. A., & Noorouzi, R. A. (2021). New educational strategies in the third millennium. Samaa Qalam Cultural and Publishing Institute, Qom. https://www.gisoom.com/book/11075903/ Rezai Rami, F., & Salimi, L. (2023). The impact of collaborative learning on improving students' social skills. https://civilica.com/doc/1670549/

Downloads

Published

2025-06-03

Submitted

2026-02-10

Revised

2026-07-17

Accepted

2026-07-25

How to Cite

Al-Abbasi, M. R. A., Khorshidi, A., Al-Fadhli, A. . A. M., & Saeidian Khorasgani, N. (2025). Identifying the Constructive Components of Cooperative Learning in Islamic Studies for Lower Secondary Students in Baghdad. International Journal of Education and Cognitive Sciences, 6(3), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.ijecs.6.3.11

Similar Articles

1-10 of 166

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.